As spotted by checkpatch, use 'seq_puts' instead of 'seq_printf' when possible. It is slightly more efficient. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c index 006bf0346dec..fe8e21ce3e3d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c @@ -2550,7 +2550,7 @@ static void *tegra_pcie_ports_seq_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos) if (list_empty(&pcie->ports)) return NULL; - seq_printf(s, "Index Status\n"); + seq_puts(s, "Index Status\n"); return seq_list_start(&pcie->ports, *pos); } @@ -2587,16 +2587,16 @@ static int tegra_pcie_ports_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) seq_printf(s, "%2u ", port->index); if (up) - seq_printf(s, "up"); + seq_puts(s, "up"); if (active) { if (up) - seq_printf(s, ", "); + seq_puts(s, ", "); - seq_printf(s, "active"); + seq_puts(s, "active"); } - seq_printf(s, "\n"); + seq_puts(s, "\n"); return 0; } -- 2.30.2