On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:21 PM Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nitesh Lal wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:21 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Nitesh, > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 12:14, Nitesh Lal wrote: > > > > Based on this analysis and the fact that with your re-work the interrupts > > > > seems to be naturally spread across the CPUs, will it be safe to revert > > > > Jesse's patch > > > > > > > > e2e64a932 genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint() > > > > > > > > as it overwrites the previously set IRQ affinity mask for some of the > > > > devices? > > > > > > That's a good question. My gut feeling says yes. > > > > > > > Jesse do you want to send the revert for the patch? > > > > Also, I think it was you who suggested cc'ing > > intel-wired-lan ml as that allows intel folks, to do some initial > > testing? > > If so, we can do that here (IMHO). > > Patch sent here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210501021832.743094-1-jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > Any testing appreciated! > > Jesse > Thank you! -- Nitesh
