On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 01:26:16AM +0530, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:44:52AM -0800, Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c > > @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ > > #include <linux/nls.h> > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > > #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > > #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> > > +#endif > > You should never need a #ifdef in a .c file for an include file. If so, > something is really wrong. I agree. Also, i realized that the include was not required to address the reported error. Please find the revised patch here. From: Narendra K <narendra_k@xxxxxxxx> Subject: [PATCH] Fix compilation error when CONFIG_ACPI is unset This patch fixes compilation error descibed below introduced by the commit 6058989bad05b82e78baacce69ec14f27a11b5fd drivers/pci/pci-label.c: In function âpci_create_firmware_label_filesâ: drivers/pci/pci-label.c:366:2: error: implicit declaration of function âdevice_has_dsmâ Signed-off-by: Narendra K <narendra_k@xxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/pci-label.c | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c index 824e247..8c80138 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c @@ -174,6 +174,12 @@ pci_remove_acpi_index_label_files(struct pci_dev *pdev) return -1; } +static inline bool +device_has_dsm(struct device *dev) +{ + return false; +} + #else static const char device_label_dsm_uuid[] = { -- 1.7.3.1 With regards, Narendra Kÿô.nÇ·®+%˱é¥wÿº{.nÇ·¥{±þ"þ)íèjg¬±¨¶Ýjÿ¾«þG«é¸¢·¦j:+v¨wèm¶ÿþø®w¥þ࣢·hâÿÙ