On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:34:35 -0500 Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/10/2011 11:34 PM, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > > Hi Prarit, > > Hi Hidetoshi, > > > > > Which is your goal?: > > 1) Allow changing mask while test, to inject errors originally masked > > #1 is my goal. Unfortunately in some of the latest > BIOSes, the masks are set such that ALL errors are > masked off. I should still be able to test out the > *software* though ... > > > 2) Allow setting an error bit even if it is masked > > > > Did you refer commit b49bfd32901625e4adcfee011d2b32a43b4db67d ? > > > > Yes, and I understand what that patch is attempting > to do. However, we have some HW that seems to now have > these masks set erroneously. Even then, testing the software > shouldn't be a problem. > > FWIW, new patch. dnelson pointed out that in the case of an > error the masks did not get reset properly. Oops ... Applied, thanks Prarit. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
