On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:12 AM Gustavo Pimentel
<Gustavo.Pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 14:27:9, Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 11/2/2020 7:45 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:40 AM Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> DesignWare core has a TLP digest (TD) override bit in one of the control
> > >> registers of ATU. This bit also needs to be programmed for proper ECRC
> > >> functionality. This is currently identified as an issue with DesignWare
> > >> IP version 4.90a. This patch does the required programming in ATU upon
> > >> querying the system policy for ECRC.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >> V3:
> > >> * Added 'Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx>'
> > >>
> > >> V2:
> > >> * Addressed Jingoo's review comment
> > >> * Removed saving 'td' bit information in 'dw_pcie' structure
> > >>
> > >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++++--
> > >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 +
> > >> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > >> index b5e438b70cd5..cbd651b219d2 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > >> @@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
> > >> dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_UPPER_TARGET,
> > >> upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
> > >> val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
> > >> + if (pci->version == 0x490A)
> > >> + val = val | pcie_is_ecrc_enabled() << PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT;
> > >> val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ?
> > >> val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val;
> > >> dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, val);
> > >> @@ -294,8 +296,10 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
> > >> lower_32_bits(pci_addr));
> > >> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET,
> > >> upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
> > >> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type |
> > >> - PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no));
> > >> + val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
> > >> + if (pci->version == 0x490A)
> > >
> > > Is this even possible? Are the non-unroll ATU registers available post 4.80?
> > I'm not sure. Gustavo might have information about this. I made this
> > change so that it is taken care off even if they available.
>
> The Synopsys DesignWare PCIe IP is highly configurable, therefore is
> dependable on what the design team has configured for their solution.
> Although Synopsys doesn't recommend the use of non-unroll ATU, the
> customers are free to select what they want for their design.
Okay, then there's a bug in the driver if the version is set to 0x480A
or later and non-unroll is used:
if (pci->version >= 0x480A || (!pci->version &&
dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(pci))) {
Probably can just drop the version checking. The detection should always work.
Rob
