On 04/13/2010 02:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/13/2010 02:11 PM, Yinghai wrote: >>> >>> I guess the real question (which I haven't looked at myself) is if the >>> E820_RESERVED -> BUSY will cause an explicitly assigned BAR from being >>> moved. That's bad, not so much for this particular range, but from BARs >>> which may be assigned by SMM. Hacking that up in a simulator >>> (Qemu/Bochs) and testing it is probably on the to do list... >> >> no, if some device BAR fall in that range, it should still use that range, and will not be relocated. >> >> will update the change log. >> > > Good, that's what we want. the driver for that device later can not use pci_request_region(). because that region is BUSY already. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
