On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Ira W. Snyder <iws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:32:43AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Monday 16 November 2009 09:48:04 am Ira W. Snyder wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 06:26:52PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> > > If you post what you've got so far and the dmesg log, I can try to >> > > help debug it. >> > > >> > >> > Here it is, both patch and dmesg inlined. The dmesg log just keeps going >> > forever after the "--- [ cut here ] ---" line. >> > >> > I've do not have a board plugged in behind the bridge at the moment. The >> > only devices are the onboard ethernet, vga, etc. That's why the second >> > host bridge has no memory behind it. >> >> The preemption imbalance concerns me. If this patch causes that, >> I'm worried that directly updating bus->resource[n] is corrupting >> something. >> > > Yes, I wonder if that is the case. The pointers are not NULL, but are > they valid? How would I know? > >> Why didn't we find an I/O port window? The BIOS configured I/O ports >> for devices, so there must be a window. You found earlier that the >> I/O port aperture seemed to be described at 0xd0, so I'm curious why >> we didn't find it this time. >> > > I'm not sure, I added some extra debugging code to the patch, and it > seems that resources don't work for IO ports. See the relevant output > below. Things still crashed in exactly the same way. > >> There are two host bridges here, but the second has no devices below it. >> I suppose it's possible there's some sort of "transparent" mode where >> the first bridge forwards anything it sees, so the window description >> at 0xd0 doesn't really matter. That would mean we couldn't support hot- >> adding devices under the second bridge unless we know how to program >> a real aperture in the first bridge and turn off that transparent mode. >> But this is just speculation. >> > > I unplugged all devices from my crate, which is why there is nothing > behind the second bridge. I can get a test device if necessary. Until > the kernel doesn't crash, this seems unnecessary. > >> The two host bridges should have different buses below them. Both of >> your bridges want to update resources for the bus at 0xf7883800, so >> that's not going to work. If you arrange to have x86_pci_root_bus_res_quirks() >> called, do you see it called twice, with a different pci_bus each time? >> > > Should I add this call at the end of my quirk function? I'm very > unfamiliar with the PCI subsystem internals. > > Here is the revised output from the revised patch below. Note that even > though I fill in the IO resource with the IO ports, it gets printed as > NULL. Why would that be? > > [ 0.304015] pci 0000:00:00.0: calling cnb20le_res+0x0/0x371 > [ 0.308014] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: busses: 0 to 0 > [ 0.312014] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: noPF 0xfc20 0xfeaf > [ 0.316013] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: noPF [mem 0xfc200000-0xfeafffff] > [ 0.320014] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: PF 0xfc00 0xfc0f > [ 0.324012] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: PF [mem 0xfc000000-0xfc0fffff pref] > [ 0.328014] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: IO 0xd000 0xdffc > [ 0.332010] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: IO (null) > [ 0.336011] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: parent bus: f7885800 number 0 pri 0 sec 0 > [ 0.340011] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: parent res0: [mem 0xfc200000-0xfeafffff] > [ 0.344011] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: parent res1: [mem 0xfc000000-0xfc0fffff pref] > [ 0.348010] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: parent res2: (null) > [ 0.352010] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: parent res3: (null) > [ 0.356009] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: parent res4: (null) > [ 0.360009] pci 0000:00:00.0: CNB20LE: parent res5: (null) > [ 0.364074] pci 0000:00:00.0: calling quirk_resource_alignment+0x0/0x164 > [ 0.368090] pci 0000:00:00.1: found [1166:0009] class 000600 header type 00 > [ 0.372014] pci 0000:00:00.1: calling quirk_no_ata_d3+0x0/0x24 > [ 0.376013] pci 0000:00:00.1: calling acpi_pm_check_graylist+0x0/0x2d > [ 0.380009] * The chipset may have PM-Timer Bug. Due to workarounds for a bug, > [ 0.380014] * this clock source is slow. If you are sure your timer does not have > [ 0.380018] * this bug, please use "acpi_pm_good" to disable the workaround > [ 0.384013] pci 0000:00:00.1: calling cnb20le_res+0x0/0x371 > [ 0.388014] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: busses: 1 to 1 > [ 0.392014] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: noPF 0xfeb0 0xfebf > [ 0.396010] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: noPF (null) > [ 0.400014] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: PF 0xfc10 0xfc1f > [ 0.404009] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: PF (null) > [ 0.408014] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: IO 0xe000 0xeffc > [ 0.412009] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: IO (null) > [ 0.416011] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: parent bus: f7885800 number 0 pri 0 sec 0 > [ 0.420011] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: parent res0: [mem 0xfc200000-0xfeafffff] > [ 0.424011] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: parent res1: [mem 0xfc000000-0xfc0fffff pref] > [ 0.428010] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: parent res2: (null) > [ 0.432010] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: parent res3: (null) > [ 0.436009] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: parent res4: (null) > [ 0.440009] pci 0000:00:00.1: CNB20LE: parent res5: (null) > > And the revised patch, with debugging output added: > > From 8fbbf7f99e58a1c95580783a1ba7dd6ebdd45187 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ira W. Snyder <iws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:42:39 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] PCI: read memory ranges out of Broadcom CNB20LE host bridge > > Read the memory ranges behind the Broadcom CNB20LE host bridge out of the > hardware. This allows PCI hotplugging to work, since we know which memory > range to allocate PCI BAR's from. > > Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/pci/Makefile | 1 + > arch/x86/pci/broadcom_bus.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/x86/pci/broadcom_bus.c > > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile > index d8a0a62..f762c05 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ) += numaq_32.o > > obj-y += common.o early.o > obj-y += amd_bus.o > +obj-y += broadcom_bus.o > obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += intel_bus.o > > ifeq ($(CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG),y) > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/broadcom_bus.c b/arch/x86/pci/broadcom_bus.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..5d56e23 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/broadcom_bus.c > @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ > +/* > + * Read address ranges from a Broadcom CNB20LE Host Bridge > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2009 Ira W. Snyder <iws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + * > + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License > + * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any > + * kind, whether express or implied. > + */ > + > +#define DEBUG 1 > + > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/dmi.h> > +#include <linux/pci.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <asm/pci_x86.h> > + > +#include "bus_numa.h" > + > +static int res_num = 0; why? YH > + > +static void __devinit cnb20le_res(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus; > + u16 word1, word2; > + u8 fbus, lbus; > + > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x44, &fbus); > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x45, &lbus); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: busses: %d to %d\n", fbus, lbus); > + > + pci_read_config_word(dev, 0xc0, &word1); > + pci_read_config_word(dev, 0xc2, &word2); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: noPF 0x%.4x 0x%.4x\n", word1, word2); > + if (word1 != word2) { > + bus->resource[res_num]->start = (word1 << 16) | 0x0000; > + bus->resource[res_num]->end = (word2 << 16) | 0xffff; > + bus->resource[res_num]->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: noPF %pR\n", bus->resource[res_num]); > + res_num++; > + } > + > + pci_read_config_word(dev, 0xc4, &word1); > + pci_read_config_word(dev, 0xc6, &word2); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: PF 0x%.4x 0x%.4x\n", word1, word2); > + if (word1 != word2) { > + bus->resource[res_num]->start = (word1 << 16) | 0x0000; > + bus->resource[res_num]->end = (word2 << 16) | 0xffff; > + bus->resource[res_num]->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH; > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: PF %pR\n", bus->resource[res_num]); > + res_num++; > + } > + > + pci_read_config_word(dev, 0xd0, &word1); > + pci_read_config_word(dev, 0xd2, &word2); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: IO 0x%.4x 0x%.4x\n", word1, word2); > + if (word1 != word2) { > + bus->resource[res_num]->start = word1; > + bus->resource[res_num]->end = word2; > + bus->resource[res_num]->flags = IORESOURCE_IO; > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: IO %pR\n", bus->resource[res_num]); > + res_num++; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: parent bus: %p number %d pri %d sec %d\n", bus, bus->number, bus->primary, bus->secondary); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: parent res0: %pR\n", dev->bus->resource[0]); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: parent res1: %pR\n", dev->bus->resource[1]); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: parent res2: %pR\n", dev->bus->resource[2]); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: parent res3: %pR\n", dev->bus->resource[3]); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: parent res4: %pR\n", dev->bus->resource[4]); > + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "CNB20LE: parent res5: %pR\n", dev->bus->resource[5]); > +} > + > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_LE, cnb20le_res); > -- > 1.5.4.3 > > Thanks, Ira > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html