>-----Original Message----- >From: Grant Grundler [mailto:grundler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: 2009年6月16日 2:48 >To: Tang, Feng >Cc: greg@xxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; Pan, Jacob jun; >Barnes, Jesse; Brown, Len >Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: Intel Moorestown platform "PCI" support > >On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:27:36PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote: >> > And what is CONFIG_SFI? >> Hi Greg, >> >> SFI stands for Simple Firmware Interface, it is like a reduced subset of ACPI >> standards, > >Would it make sense to call this option "CONFIG_ACPI_SFI" instead? > >Knowing SFI shares some code with ACPI is important. Actually SFI spec leverages some table definition of the ACPI standard, the SFI code will reuse some existing ACPI code just to keep the kernel tree simple, that's why Len Brown is moving some generic code out of ACPI driver. SFI code should work separately with CONFIG_ACPI=n, so I think CONFIG_SFI is a fair name. Thanks, Feng > >thanks, >grant ?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳???骅w* jg????????G??⒏ ⒎?:+v???????? ????＂??????
