libata, devm_*, and MSI ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun / Jeff,

I am working on MSI support for sata_mv, and am trying to puzzle out
exactly what the kernel expects for this.  Looking at other drivers,
both libata and otherwise, yields a variety of conflicting implementations.

For starters, the MSI HOW-TO suggests that drivers must be careful
to invoke pci_disable_msi() on module unload, but I don't see that
happening anywhere in libata.

Unless, Tejun, the devm_* routines automatically do this.. do they?

Next, there's no mention of a need for invoking pci_intx() in the HOW-TO,
yet some device drivers call it, and others do not.

Eg. from ahci.c, we have this:

       if ((hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI) || pci_enable_msi(pdev))
               pci_intx(pdev, 1);

Which agrees with the existing code in sata_mv:

       if (msi && pci_enable_msi(pdev))
               pci_intx(pdev, 1);

Which seems to call pci_intx() only when MSI is *not* used.  Fine.
But then in sata_vsc.c, we do sort of the opposite:

       if (pci_enable_msi(pdev) == 0)
               pci_intx(pdev, 0);

Either that one is wrong, or pci_intx() is unnecessary in all cases.
Again, the MSI HOW-TO doesn't even mention this routine.

Looking through the network drivers, it seems that some of them
do the pci_intx(pdev,1) call for the cases where pci_enable_msi() fails,
similar to ahci.c and sata_mv.c.

But not all of them do that.

Perhaps somebody from the PCI side of things might enlighten us all.

Thanks



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux