Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:24:42PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Spell "Signaled" like the PCI SIG spells it (not Signalled). > > Can I propose an alternative patch? I don't have a problem with > Randy's, but since we already use "MSI-X" for that capability, maybe we > should use "MSI" for this one? It brings that line back down below 80 > columns, which is nice. > > I further wonder if we want to report 'Enable' and 'Mask' in the same > order ... and 'Count' certainly seems like a better name than 'TabSize'. > > ---- > > From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Change the spelling of 'Signalled' to 'Signaled' to match the PCI spec. > Report the capability as 'MSI' instead of either 'Message Signaled > Interrupts' to fit better with MSI-X and bring the width of this line > below 80 columns. > > Inspired-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I certainly have no problem with this change. Thanks. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
