On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:07:17 -0400 Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > OK, not all architectures use the generic code, but I've been > > through and they all do more or less the above (mn10300 and frv > > just return the address, but their readl() and inl() are identical) > > > > I don't recall anyone ever promising that the iomap interfaces would > be usable with legacy accessors. I'd certainly prefer it if we > didn't, as well, as it makes for more explicitly written drivers... > > Just because you can use them, doesn't mean you should. > ok so now we're full circle. I started with a real ioremap, was told "no must use iomap" despite the same argument you make, and now we're back to square one. What I want is an interface that can replace ioremap() for the common "I want the bar uncached" case. Nothing more nothing less.... sigh. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
