Re: post 2.6.26 requires pciehp_slot_with_bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:38:38PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> >The hard part is figuring out a convention that we can all agree
> >on. ;) I've no strong feelings here, but of the options
> >presented, I lean towards "2a", "2b" or "2-1", "2-2".
> >
> 
> Only my hope is I don't want to look "2a" or "2-1" on normal platform.
> It should be "2" on normal platform.

Yes, the first slot will be "2", the second slot "2a" or "2-1" or
whatever we decide.  I don't have a strong feeling about the name.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux