Re: post 2.6.26 requires pciehp_slot_with_bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:07:18 -0700
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:39 pm Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> > This is a laptop with a single expressport that worked fine up until
> > this merge window. What changed and why is it no longer possible to
> > support this hardware without a kernel parameter?
> 
> Yeah we're being a bit more careful about registering hotplug slots these 
> days.  The fact that you got a conflict message indicates that more than one 
> driver is trying to bind to that PCIe port and handle hotplug for it.  I 
> guess acpiphp must already be loaded?
> 

Nope. Only pciehp is builtin, and acpiphp is not loaded. Anything
non-hotplug related that can block stuff?

Anyway, the port seems to work even with that warning present though
(sorry for not testing that properly earlier). Stray warnings is still
not pleasant though, so I can do some more testing if you have some
ideas.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux