On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:51 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2023, at 16:33, Paul Moore wrote: > > On May 17, 2023 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > We probably should move the audit_serial() and auditsc_get_stamp() > > away from the watch/mark/tree functions, but that isn't your problem. > > > > Anyway, this looks okay to me; do you have a problem if I merge this > > via the audit/next branch or were you hoping to have this go in > > through a different tree? > > Merging it through your tree is probably best, Andrew can either > pick the ones that nobody else took, or I can resend the rest. Easy enough, merged to audit/next, thanks. -- paul-moore.com
