On 2022-05-17 4:00 p.m., Helge Deller wrote:
On 5/17/22 20:28, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022, 20:11:38 CEST schrieb Helge Deller:
I can easily split out the pr_warn("WARNING").
Would make sense IMHO.
I split that patch out now.
Dave, can you please check if you are ok with it?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=67c35a3b646cc68598ff0bb28de5f8bd7b2e81b3
I used the wording from your other mail.
Looks better than what I sent!
Moving the get_ptep() back to the original place seems ok, and I'll keep
the strange indenting which checkpatch want.
If its back at the original place then there is no need to change as
checkpatch will not complain on unmodified lines.
I meant "back to the place where it was versions before".
So, it has to move anyway now.
If it needs to be moved and
changed then I would say do it in it's own patch as well.
I kept it in the way Dave sent it (with the checkpatch fixups I added).
Just pushed a new "for-next" tree at the usual place:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/log/?h=for-next
Will test.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@xxxxxxxx
