On 5/17/22 20:28, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022, 20:11:38 CEST schrieb Helge Deller:
>
>> I can easily split out the pr_warn("WARNING").
>
> Would make sense IMHO.
I split that patch out now.
Dave, can you please check if you are ok with it?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=67c35a3b646cc68598ff0bb28de5f8bd7b2e81b3
I used the wording from your other mail.
>> Moving the get_ptep() back to the original place seems ok, and I'll keep
>> the strange indenting which checkpatch want.
>
> If its back at the original place then there is no need to change as
> checkpatch will not complain on unmodified lines.
I meant "back to the place where it was versions before".
So, it has to move anyway now.
> If it needs to be moved and
> changed then I would say do it in it's own patch as well.
I kept it in the way Dave sent it (with the checkpatch fixups I added).
Just pushed a new "for-next" tree at the usual place:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/log/?h=for-next
Helge
