Re: [PATCH] drivers: Follow the indentation coding standard on printks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> --- a/drivers/atm/suni.c
> +++ b/drivers/atm/suni.c
> @@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ static int suni_start(struct atm_dev *dev)
>  		timer_setup(&poll_timer, suni_hz, 0);
>  		poll_timer.expires = jiffies+HZ;
>  #if 0
> -printk(KERN_DEBUG "[u] p=0x%lx,n=0x%lx\n",(unsigned long) poll_timer.list.prev,
> -    (unsigned long) poll_timer.list.next);
> +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "[u] p=0x%lx,n=0x%lx\n",(unsigned long) poll_timer.list.prev,
> +	    (unsigned long) poll_timer.list.next);

Why not use DPRINTK(), defined at the start of suni.c?

    Andrew



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux