On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:35:34 +0200 Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote: > I think it makes sense to keep at least one warning. > Rolf Eike proposed a pr_warn_once() which seems the best compromise > as it keeps us at least informed which packages needs updating and > how relevant it is to keep those wrappers.... I agree that if we are to keep the warning, pr_warn_once is a better choice. In the rpc.idmapd strace I still see 4635 inotify_init1(IN_NONBLOCK) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) so maybe you want to wrap around inotify_init1 as well? Regards, jer