On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:18:05AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:44:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 6/3/20 2:14 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 01:57:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > >>>>> sparc 32 bit... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > >>> > > >>> I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > >>> > > >>> 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > > >>> Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > >>> > > >>> Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > >>> > > >>> Is there another test I need to run? > > >> > > >> This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might > > >> have issues on various architectures. > > >> > > >> Can folks please provide an update on the testing status? > > > > > > I believe the tests were failing for Guenter due to another patch set...[1] > > > > > > My tests with just this series are working. > > > > > >>From my understanding the other failures were unrelated.[2] > > > > > > <quote Mike Rapoport> > > > I've checked the patch above on top of the mmots which already has > > > Ira's patches and it booted fine. I've used sparc32_defconfig to build > > > the kernel and qemu-system-sparc with default machine and CPU. > > > </quote> > > > > > > Mike, am I wrong? Do you think the kmap() patches are still causing issues? > > sparc32 UP and microblaze work for me with next-20200603, but I didn't > test other architectures. > > > For my part, all I can say is that -next is in pretty bad shape right now. > > The summary of my tests says: > > > > Build results: > > total: 151 pass: 130 fail: 21 > > Qemu test results: > > total: 430 pass: 375 fail: 55 > > > > sparc32 smp images in next-20200603 still crash for me with a spinlock > > recursion. > > I think this is because Will's fixes [1] are not yet in -next. > > > s390 images hang early in boot. Several others (alpha, arm64, > > various ppc) don't even compile. I can run some more bisects over time, > > but this is becoming a full-time job :-(. > > > > Guenter > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200526173302.377-1-will@xxxxxxxxxx I abandoned the bisect and tested with this fix.[1] It passes. Guenter, on the original thread we had microblaze and ppc working with my fix. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519194215.GA71941@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ Sounds like the current failures above are from something much newer in the tree. Ira [1] 23:26:24 > /home/iweiny/dev/linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh Build reference: next-20200603-3-gf5afe92a2135 Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > -- > Sincerely yours, > Mike.
