On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/19/20 10:13 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:42:15PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:48:43AM -0700, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>>> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The kunmap_atomic clean up failed to remove one set of pagefault/preempt
> >>>>> enables when vaddr is not in the fixmap.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fixes: bee2128a09e6 ("arch/kunmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate code")
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> microblazeel works with this patch,
> >>>
> >>> Awesome... Andrew in my rush yesterday I should have put a reported by on the
> >>> patch for Guenter as well.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry about that Guenter,
> >>
> >> No worries.
> >>
> >>> Ira
> >>>
> >>>> as do the nosmp sparc32 boot tests,
> >>>> but sparc32 boot tests with SMP enabled still fail with lots of messages
> >>>> such as:
> >>>>
> >>>> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/0 pfn:006a1
> >>>> page:f0933420 refcount:0 mapcount:1 mapping:(ptrval) index:0x1
> >>>> flags: 0x0()
> >>>> raw: 00000000 00000100 00000122 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000
> >>>> page dumped because: nonzero mapcount
> >>>> Modules linked in:
> >>>> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G B 5.7.0-rc6-next-20200518-00002-gb178d2d56f29 #1
> >>>> [f00e7ab8 :
> >>>> bad_page+0xa8/0x108 ]
> >>>> [f00e8b54 :
> >>>> free_pcppages_bulk+0x154/0x52c ]
> >>>> [f00ea024 :
> >>>> free_unref_page+0x54/0x6c ]
> >>>> [f00ed864 :
> >>>> free_reserved_area+0x58/0xec ]
> >>>> [f0527104 :
> >>>> kernel_init+0x14/0x110 ]
> >>>> [f000b77c :
> >>>> ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0x38 ]
> >>>> [00000000 :
> >>>> 0x0 ]
> >>>>
> >>>> Code path leading to that message is different but always the same
> >>>> from free_unref_page().
> >
> > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for
> > sparc 32 bit...
> >
> > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch?
> >
> > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions
> >
>
> That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches.
I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass...
08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh
Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f
Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Is there another test I need to run?
Ira
>
> Guenter
>
> > Alternately I will need to figure out how to run the sparc on qemu here...
> >
> > Thanks very much for all the testing though! :-D
> >
> > Ira
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> Still testing ppc images.
> >>>>
> >>
> >> ppc image tests are passing with this patch.
> >>
> >> Guenter
>
