> On 5/21/20 10:42 AM, Ira Weiny wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On 5/19/20 10:13 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:42:15PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:48:43AM -0700, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: > >>>>>>> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The kunmap_atomic clean up failed to remove one set of > >>>>>>> pagefault/preempt enables when vaddr is not in the fixmap. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Fixes: bee2128a09e6 ("arch/kunmap_atomic: consolidate duplicate > >>>>>>> code") > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> microblazeel works with this patch, > >>>>> > >>>>> Awesome... Andrew in my rush yesterday I should have put a > >>>>> reported by on the patch for Guenter as well. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sorry about that Guenter, > >>>> > >>>> No worries. > >>>> > >>>>> Ira > >>>>> > >>>>>> as do the nosmp sparc32 boot tests, but sparc32 boot tests with > >>>>>> SMP enabled still fail with lots of messages such as: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/0 pfn:006a1 > >>>>>> page:f0933420 refcount:0 mapcount:1 mapping:(ptrval) index:0x1 > >>>>>> flags: 0x0() > >>>>>> raw: 00000000 00000100 00000122 00000000 00000001 00000000 > >>>>>> 00000000 00000000 page dumped because: nonzero mapcount > Modules > >>>>>> linked in: > >>>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G B 5.7.0-rc6-next- > 20200518-00002-gb178d2d56f29 #1 > >>>>>> [f00e7ab8 : > >>>>>> bad_page+0xa8/0x108 ] > >>>>>> [f00e8b54 : > >>>>>> free_pcppages_bulk+0x154/0x52c ] > >>>>>> [f00ea024 : > >>>>>> free_unref_page+0x54/0x6c ] > >>>>>> [f00ed864 : > >>>>>> free_reserved_area+0x58/0xec ] > >>>>>> [f0527104 : > >>>>>> kernel_init+0x14/0x110 ] > >>>>>> [f000b77c : > >>>>>> ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0x38 ] > >>>>>> [00000000 : > >>>>>> 0x0 ] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Code path leading to that message is different but always the > >>>>>> same from free_unref_page(). > >>> > >>> Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is > >>> odd for sparc 32 bit... > >>> > >>> Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > >>> > >>> 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > >>> > >> > >> That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up > patches. > > > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > > > That doesn't look like it is linux-next, which I guess means that something > else in linux-next breaks it. What is your qemu version ? Ah yea that was just 5.7-rc4 with my patch set applied. Yes must be something else or an interaction with my patch set. Did I see another email with Mike which may fix this? Ira > > Thanks, > Guenter > > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > > > Is there another test I need to run? > > > > Ira > > > > > >> > >> Guenter > >> > >>> Alternately I will need to figure out how to run the sparc on qemu here... > >>> > >>> Thanks very much for all the testing though! :-D > >>> > >>> Ira > >>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Still testing ppc images. > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> ppc image tests are passing with this patch. > >>>> > >>>> Guenter > >>