> >> The sa_restorer field is obsolete and not in the hppa struct > >> sigaction, but we still define SA_RESTORER. What should be done? > > Basically to not break userspace we can't (and shouldn't) add the sa_restorer struct member. > > So, the only option would be to drop the SA_RESTORER #define, right? > > But I have no idea how and if this will break some builds, since the major arches seem to define SA_RESTORER... > > > I asked the question when I saw the crashme kernel test package didn't > build due to the missing field. > > In the generic sigaction struct, the field is conditional on the > SA_RESTORER define. I imagine that > the major arches also have sa_restorer struct member. > > I agree it seems best to remove the define. Ok, then can you send a patch ? Should we request to backport it into stable kernels? I think so... Helge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
