On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 18:24 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > so ... ACK? > > > > Um, well, it looks like a trivial code shift, so it doesn't really need > > one (it can just go through the trivial tree). > > It's part of a larger set not all of which is trivial. OK, so it looks fine to me. > > Unless there's some > > reason actually to test it out on parisc because something will break > > (in which case, I'll need the actual patch, not just a quoted one). > > > > James > > A build test would be nice. Just forwarded you a patch. > It's also on linux-next. Actually, sending it to me doesn't help. Being busy and lazy, I want to see if someone else will test it ... that's why we send patches to the list. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
