On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Rolf Eike Beer <eike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Dienstag 05 Juli 2011, 19:28:35 schrieben Sie: >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, John David Anglin <dave.anglin@xxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> The Linux man page says the mprotect addr must be a valid pointer or a >> >> multiple of PAGESIZE. >> >> It's not clear what the mprotect call is trying to protect but it is >> >> definitely not page aligned. >> > >> > It's trying to protect the new stack for the thread, which is >> > obviously in the wrong spot. >> >> Good news. >> >> I have fixed tst-cputimer1. > > You also wrote "OK, fixed the kernel." So where an when will these fixes show > up? Unfortunately I hosed my setup and I didn't have git installed to make a proper diff so here's a diff versus a somewhat recent tree. WIP patch: http://www.parisc-linux.org/~carlos/futex.diff Cheers, Carlos. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
