Re: tst-cputimer1 and tst-timer4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag 05 Juli 2011, 19:28:35 schrieben Sie:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, John David Anglin <dave.anglin@xxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> >> The Linux man page says the mprotect addr must be a valid pointer or a
> >> multiple of PAGESIZE.
> >> It's not clear what the mprotect call is trying to protect but it is
> >> definitely not page aligned.
> > 
> > It's trying to protect the new stack for the thread, which is
> > obviously in the wrong spot.
> 
> Good news.
> 
> I have fixed tst-cputimer1.

You also wrote "OK, fixed the kernel." So where an when will these fixes show 
up?

Eike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux