Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Am Freitag, 18. März 2011, 17:39:57 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: > > Am Mittwoch, 2. März 2011, 21:19:24 schrieb Jesse Brandeburg: > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Guy Martin <gmsoft@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Jeff, > > > > > > > > Any luck getting this into mainline ? > > > > > > Hi Guy, sorry for the delay, > > > We haven't been able to get our contacts in HP to give us a decent > > > response so far, we are following up with them to see whats up. We > > > have not lost the patch and are still tracking it internally. > > > > > > Give us a couple more weeks if that is okay and we should be able to > > > settle this by then. > > > > I wonder what exactly you are waiting for? This is a sanity check that > > we > > disable, so no working systems could get broken by this. And every > > single > > C8000 seems to be affected by this and is working fine with that patch. > > So maybe people at HP might have a clue _why_ this is screwed, but > > until then I don't see any point in waiting. > > > > So please just add my tested-by and push this upstream soon. Since this > > is basically a hardware quirk I would like to get this into stable also > > so we may run vanilla 2.6.38.1 or something like that on C8000. > > > > Tested-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@xxxxxxxxx> > > For the netdev folks: it's this patch we are talking about > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-parisc/msg03091.html > > I would love to see that someone finally picks this up and pushes this > upstream, CC stable. This is absolutely annoying as it breaks every time > anyone touches the kernel on one of this machines. > > Jeff, David, James: can you please make a decision of who takes this and > then just do it? Ping?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
