> Have you played with any of the indirect function support in the tools yet? > > Recent changes by Dave Miller have forced me to look into supporting IFUNC*. > > It looks relatively easy, I was just wondering if there was anything I > should watch out for on the compiler side? I'm not familiar with this. I did a quick scan and it doesn't seem that any GCC backends do anything special wrt IFUNC_ASM_TYPE. There is an ifunc attribute which is used to mark a function with the STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol type. So, I think support is mainly in binutils. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
