Re: [patch 0/8] parisc: Convert to new irq_chip functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:37 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Gah. You set it indirect via IRQF_PERCPU with setup/request_irq.
> > 
> > Staring too long into that code makes my brain fuzzy.
> 
> Yes ... know the feeling over the years trying to keep up with the
> various irq schemes.  Got to say, it's a lot easier now: The way parisc
> chips accept interrupts is essentially MSI.  Trying to live in the old
> world modelled on the x86 PIC wasn't fun.
> 
> So did you want me to roll all the fixes together and apply them, or is
> there something else that needs to happen?

All yours. You might want to split out the CHECK... bugfix first.

There will be some minor follow up changes, but they depend on code
which I'm going to push soon.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux