Re: vfork test case.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

>         /* Return, no need to restore the PIC register. */
> -       ldw     -84(%sp), %rp
> -       bv      %r0(%rp)
> -       ldwm    -64(%sp), %r3
> +       ldw     -20(%sp), %rp
> +       bv,n    %r0(%rp)

For the reasons discussed, I don't believe that %rp should be restored
from the stack.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux