Re: vfork test case.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:20 PM, John David Anglin
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> At this point if the parent restores rp from the parents frame it will
>> get the rp the child's call to close saved.
>
> You are right.
>
>>
>> The only way to get around this is to *ensure* the kernel
>> saves/restores r2 across the syscall.
>>
>> I see no other way around it.
>
> It looks as if r2 is saved for both parent and child.

Perfect, in that case we have all the bases covered.

I have seen no regressions in my testing, so I will push this patch
into glibc-ports, and notify debian.

I still saw a hang in tst-vfork2, but I haven't investigated this yet.

Cheers,
Carlos.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux