On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 13:12 -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > We need to start splitting up your giant "stability" patch into > > manageable chunks. > > Here's the fourth chunk. Am I being paranoid? Could you explain what difference you think it makes ... because I can't really see one. All the patch seems to be doing is setting r1 to the stack pointer with interrupts enabled and then copying the value with interrupts disabled, which is fine, but I don't see how it's different from setting r30 directly from the task entry within the interrupt disabled region. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
