Re: vfork test case.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/16/2009 10:35 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
On 12/15/2009 11:21 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
I have constructed a vfork test case which shows some of the problems
I have using vfork reliably. This fails every time on my PA8700 system
running 2.6.32-rc6. It appears as though r28 (ret0) in the parent is
being corrupted.

The test doesn't fail on two of my builds:
Linux mx3210 2.6.31.7 #5 Wed Dec 9 22:49:53 EST 2009 parisc64
Linux hiauly6 2.6.31.7 #18 Wed Dec 9 21:34:36 EST 2009 parisc

I did tested your testcase on my c3000 too but it didn't failed for me either.
This was on some 2.6.32-rc candidate.

I think it must be because Carlos is building SMP kernels.

I couldn't reproduce on my SMP box either (but it's PA8500 instead of PA8700):
cpu             : PA8500 (PCX-W)
model           : 9000/785/J5000
Linux ls3017 2.6.32-32bit #79 SMP Thu Dec 3 14:04:53 CET 2009 parisc GNU/Linux

Helge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux