Re: [git patches] xfs and block fixes for virtually indexed arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:30:36AM -0500, tytso@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> That's because apparently the iSCSI and DMA blocks assume that they
>> have Real Pages (tm) passed to block I/O requests, and apparently XFS
>> ran into problems when sending vmalloc'ed pages.  I don't know if this
>> is a problem if we pass the bio layer addresses coming from the SLAB
>> allocator, but oral tradition seems to indicate this is problematic,
>> although no one has given me the full chapter and verse explanation
>> about why this is so.
>
> Actually at least iscsi now has a workaround for that by checking for
> PageSlab.  Back when we deal with the XFS issue that check was only
> available with debug options enabled.  I tried to sort it out by
> agreeing with the block and iscsi folks that either

DRBD has the same workaround as well:

        if (disable_sendpage || (page_count(page) < 1) || PageSlab(page))

But it seems like a gross hack to me. Perhaps this should be 
passed as some sort of BIO attribute?

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux