On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 12:13 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 08 September 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:19 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > On Monday 08 September 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > Put it back again by making RTC_CLASS > > > > unselectable if the architecture is parisc. > > > > > > Easier if those distros just wouldn't select RTC_CLASS then. :) > > > > Yes, but think of distro config people rather like users ... if you can > > prevent them from doing something stupid, it's a good idea. In this > > case, there's currently no way anyone should ever select RTC_CLASS on > > parisc, so we should make that clear in the Kconfig file. > > Preventing them from doing stupid stuff is exactly why we > have Kconfig prevent both legacy *AND* framework RTC code > from being selected. :) > > Of course stupidity is infinite, and we didn't know about > this particular instance in advance... > > > > > And long term, better to work with RTC_CLASS. Eliminate that > > > crufty asm-parisc/rtc.h file and one more GEN_RTC user; and > > > share more widely-used infrastructure. > > > > > > If I read things right, that would be easy: the PARISC RTC is > > > two firmware calls, ptc_tod_{read,set}(), which would map to > > > RTC class {read,set}_time() methods of about six lines each. > > > The RTC framework can do UIE emulation, if needed. > > > > OK, I can look at that, but in the mean time could we make the option > > that causes the damage unselectable? > > I'd worry if "the mean time" takes too long. But lacking a > PARISC laptop to fix this on, I'm unlikely to complain much. What is the expectation? If you're expecting all the architectures to migrate over to RTC_CLASS, actually telling linux-arch and saying why its a good idea would have been helpful. All the PDC real time clock calls can do are read and set, nothing else, so it's idealy suited to the GEN_RTC infrastructure ... what's the benefit in moving it to RTC_CLASS? > > This is technically a regression > > because before your patch GEN_RTC would override RTC_CLASS, now it's the > > other way around. > > Well, previously there was no override ... I think you mean > that parisc just completely ignored RTC_CLASS, treating it > like junk DNA. No, it's a regression. You made it so when you added this # # These legacy RTC drivers just cause too many conflicts with the generic # RTC framework ... let's not even try to coexist any more. # if RTC_LIB=n Around the GEN_RTC configuration. This turns off the ability to select GEN_RTC if you've said yes to RTC_CLASS. Since RTC_CLASS is currently unsupported on parisc, we need to fix that by making the RTC_CLASS option unselectable on parisc. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html