Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:23:33PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> duplicate pa11_dma_alloc_consistent; more appropriate appears
>> pa11_dma_alloc_noncoherent here.
>>
>> Not tested, please confirm that this fix is correct
>
> I don't think it is. The memories are fading, so I don't recall why it
> is we do it this way, but I'm pretty sure it's correct the way it is.
>
Maybe this helps a bit: later I found that something similar occurs in
drivers/parisc/{ccio-dma.c, sba_iommu.c}:
1010: .alloc_consistent = ccio_alloc_consistent,
.alloc_noncoherent = ccio_alloc_consistent,
1036: .alloc_consistent = sba_alloc_consistent,
.alloc_noncoherent = sba_alloc_consistent,
However in these files the functions {ccio_alloc, sba_alloc}_noncoherent
do not exist.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
