James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:23 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote: >> duplicate pa11_dma_alloc_consistent; more appropriate appears >> pa11_dma_alloc_noncoherent here. >> >> Not tested, please confirm that this fix is correct > > No, it looks completely incorrect to me. What makes you think a pcxl > box has a problem with coherency? Ok, please ignore the patch then. It just appeared suspicious to me that the function did exist, but the names assigned were different. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
