On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Paul Walmsley wrote: > The references to "wkup_pwrdm" on some of these clockdomains don't > look right to me. For example, this clockdomain is listed as being in > AM43XX_CM_WKUP_INST, but its enclosing powerdomain is listed as being in > AM43XX_PRM_WKUP_INST. Looks to me like it's best to have two different > wakeup powerdomains: one CM_WKUP, and one PRM_WKUP. Looks like the same problem exists with at least the PER powerdomain also. Looks to me like that needs to be split into cm_per and prm_per variants? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
