Hi, On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:50 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:44:49PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:16 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers >>> to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to >>> the PHY with or without using phandle. >>> >>> This framework will be of use only to devices that uses external PHY (PHY >>> functionality is not embedded within the controller). >>> >>> The intention of creating this framework is to bring the phy drivers spread >>> all over the Linux kernel to drivers/phy to increase code re-use and to >>> increase code maintainability. >>> >>> Comments to make PHY as bus wasn't done because PHY devices can be part of >>> other bus and making a same device attached to multiple bus leads to bad >>> design. >>> >>> If the PHY driver has to send notification on connect/disconnect, the PHY >>> driver should make use of the extcon framework. Using this susbsystem >>> to use extcon framwork will have to be analysed. >>> >>> You can find this patch series @ >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git testing >> >> Looks like there are not further comments on this series. Can you take this in >> your misc tree? > > Do you want me to queue these for you ? There are quite a few users for > this framework already and I know of at least 2 others which will show > up for v3.13. yeah sure. That would be better I think. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
