Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP2: use 'int' instead of 'unsigned' for variable 'gpmc_irq_start'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/22/2013 04:32 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [130822 01:10]:
>> On 08/22/2013 03:57 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [130822 00:55]:
>>>> 'gpmc_irq_start' is mostly used as 'int', and for a variable, do not
>>>> suggest to only use 'unsigned' as its type, so use 'int' instead of
>>>> 'unsigned' for variable 'gpmc_irq_start'.
>>>>
>>>> Also it will fix the related issue (dummy the real world failure):
>>>>
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c:728:2: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.12/fixes-non-critical.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you too.
>>
>> Hmm... excuse me, I am not quite familiar with the omap version trees,
>> so may have a doubt: "it seems this is a real bug, is it suitable to
>> belong to fixes-none-critical tree ?"
> 
> For the -rc cycle we try to limit the patches to oopses and regressions,
> especially this close to v3.11 being tagged.
> 

Really necessary.

> It seems the bug has been there for quite some time, and that we don't
> seem to have oopses or other failures reporting this. So it seems there's
> no reason for urgency to have it merged into the current -rc series.
> 

I guess so too (I only find it by compiling).


> If you (or somebody else) strongly feels that it should be in applied
> to the current -rc series as a fix instead of during the merge window,
> then please let me know the failing cases with logs showing what
> happens.
> 

Hmm... for urgent bugs, the reporters really need supply the failing
cases with logs showing what happens.

Bugs can be sort of by urgent priority (e.g. this bug is not urgent).
but for most of bugs may cause critical issue which depends on the using
environments, and can be 'imagined' by us.

Hmm... I guess: for our case, what your meaning is "fixes-none-urgent",
not "fixes-none-critical", is it correct ?  :-)


Thanks.

> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux