Hi Kishon,
On 19/08/2013 11:29, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Monday 19 August 2013 02:54 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
On 08/19/2013 05:47 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Monday 19 August 2013 10:35 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 17 August 2013 03:51 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/16/2013 04:20 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
The Palmas device contains only a USB VID detector, so modified the
compatible type to *ti,palmas-usb-vid*.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
That file is not yet in 3.11. Only the twl is there.
Is this one a rename of the twl one?
Regards,
Benoit
PALMAS USB COMPARATOR
Required Properties:
- - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb"
+ - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb-vid".
Has the old value been published in a release kernel? If so, it makes
No. This was merged only in 3.11-rc1. So I think we should take this version?
Chanwoo can you take this patch?
Ah.. the old values will be part of 3.11 kernel. So should we retain the old
values?
What is the meaning of old value? previous value related to extcon-twl.txt?
We were discussing on whether to have "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb" in
compatible value in addition to "ti,palmas-usb-vid". Stephen wanted the old
values ("ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb") if it has been published in a
release kernel.
The extcon-twl.txt was included in 3.11 kernel
Right. Since it's part of 3.11 kernel, I think we should retain the old
compatible values.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
