On 08/12/2013 08:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > >> No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where >> you include the two linked sets. > > Can you guys please think about the CC lists you're using for these > patch serieses? I've certainly no interest in random patches to the > DaVinci DMA controllers, and I suspect the same is true for most of the > people on the CC list. > Sorry. I was actually getting a sense of this. What I did initially was I copied the CC list from last years work on the same series hoping that it would be a complete mail chain. Bad judgement on my part. I should have paid more attention to Mark's rants about his inbox getting spammed with this series in those old threads ;) I guess moving forward I will use get_maintainer.pl and refine my git-send scripts with only interested folks. Any words of advice on when to and when not to CC someone remotely connected to a series is welcome. @Sekhar, let's keep only linux-omap, linux-davinci and few other interested folks on the CC chain for the rest of review on the series. Thanks, -Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
