* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [130730 06:25]: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:10:09PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:55:39PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > @@ -379,6 +407,13 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430) > > > # define soc_is_omap543x() is_omap543x() > > > #endif > > > > > > +# if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX) > > > +# undef soc_is_dra7xx > > > +# undef soc_is_dra75x > > > +# define soc_is_dra7xx() is_dra7xx() > > > +# define soc_is_dra75x() is_dra75x() > > > > since this platform is DT-only, couldn't we just believe DT-data to be > > correct of_machine_is_compatible() ? 2/3 of this patch would be removed. > > s/correct of_/correct and use of_ Makes sense to me. AFAIK we no longer need to initialize much anything super early. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
