On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:10:09PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:55:39PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > @@ -379,6 +407,13 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430) > > # define soc_is_omap543x() is_omap543x() > > #endif > > > > +# if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX) > > +# undef soc_is_dra7xx > > +# undef soc_is_dra75x > > +# define soc_is_dra7xx() is_dra7xx() > > +# define soc_is_dra75x() is_dra75x() > > since this platform is DT-only, couldn't we just believe DT-data to be > correct of_machine_is_compatible() ? 2/3 of this patch would be removed. s/correct of_/correct and use of_ -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
