Hi Nishanth, On 29/07/2013 15:17, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 07/29/2013 04:57 AM, Keerthy wrote: >> Hi Nishanth, >> >> On Wednesday 17 July 2013 10:15 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> Due to wrong older revision of documentation used as reference, we >>> seem to have a bunch of LDOs wrongly configured on OMAP5 uEVM. This >>> series is based power tree on production board 750-2628-XXX platform. >>> Unfortunately, the wrong voltages may be detrimental to OMAP5 as they >>> supply hardware blocks at voltages that are out of specification. >> >> This series looks good to me. >> >> Acked-by: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> > > Tony, Benoit - this series could prevent OMAP5 from being damaged on > uEVMs with current 3.11 rc - could you suggest what we need to do to > get it in? I'm still on vacation with no way to pull any patch... but I can still comment on the series quickly. It seems to me that this series contains some real fixes that might damage the board due to hihest voltage than expected and some which are just improvement like for the SMPS9 or LDO[28]. In theory they should no go necesseraly to -rc, but, I guess that's fine for that one. All the "fixes" are sharing more than 50% of the changelog content with only 2 changes in the code, so you'd better squash them into one patch to avoid repeating the same thing again and again. Beside that, I will ack the updated one to allow Tony to push them ASAP. Regards, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
