On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Alexander Holler <holler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe it might be worth to suggest using/returning NO_IRQ in (new) patches > instead of zero. That would make it very clear that the value 0 isn't to be > used later. Using NO_IRQ is also discouraged, and this is because we should use the if (!irq) design pattern and not if (irq == NO_IRQ). Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
