On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Alexander Holler <holler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 28.07.2013 13:14, schrieb Linus Walleij: >> What shall we do with this mess now? (...) > Hmm, maybe something which adds a mapping for a IRQ when gpio_to_irq() > is called would help. I think this bug is pointing back to my initial remark that we need to flag, in the DT node for each GPIOchip that provides "auto-IRQs" exactly which IRQ lines that will be used as simple IRQ lines. This is what I called "GPIO hogs" a while back. If this had been done, gpio_request_one() would *only* have been called on the GPIOs marked as being used for IRQs simply. And we wouldn't have had this bug. I am leaning towards reverting the whole shebang right now, and using that as an argument to hammer in my opinion that we need to do it my way unless something incredibly clever comes up. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
