On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote: > I think, In the future the OMAP pinctrl configurations would be manged in > more flexible way then now (thanks to "pinctrl PM helpers" and you;)) > - "Idle" state will be splitted to "Idle"/"sleep" > - "default" state will be splitted to "default"/"active" OK so the first ones we already have so the discussion is now down to adding the "active" state (and pinctrl_pm* helper function). I guess we need a patch set prepared which adds the "active" state and helper function as the first patch, i.e. this: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137094012703340&w=2 Can I have your ACK on this patch? I do not want to add the state unless there is a clear consumer, so it needs to go in with the first patch to a device driver that uses pinctrl_pm_select_active_state() which will be a good demonstration on its use and utility. (And a point to object and suggest other ways to do the same thing...) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
