On 07/10/2013 03:24 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [130710 05:16]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> On 06/07/2013 11:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Here are few patches to add support for SoC specific features >>> to pinctrl-single. This is needed at least for omaps to support >>> IO chain wake-up events from deeper idle states. >>> >>> With this patch series, device drivers can request named pinctrl >>> states like active and idle from the PM runtime suspend and resume >>> calls to set the wake enable bits for selected pins. Further >>> the device driver can toggle the wake-up feature as needed based on >>> the device_may_wakeup() state set by the standard sysfs >>> power/wakeup entry. >>> >>> This is implemented in a separate pinctrl-single-omap driver that >>> works together with pinctrl-single. This way the SoC specific >>> are separated from the common pinctrl-single, and allows a relatively >>> easy way to implement SoC specific things like wake-up events, >>> pin interrupts, and GPIO. >> >> What's the status of this? Would be nice to get it in 3.12. I'm basing >> the OMAP USB host wakeup support on this. > > How about I'll push an immutable branch against v3.11-rc1 when it's > tagged and send a pull request to Linus W for the first three patches? > > That way we can base other branches on this if needed. Looks good to me. Thanks. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
