On 07/08/2013 10:34 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hi, Hi, > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:44:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> We need two nodes each one with a glue layer and a musb child node. The >> instances crap in kernel has to vanish. Also that means your phy nodes >> are wrong. This is not musb with two ports but two musb instances each >> with one port. >> > > I agree completely. The current DT representation looks definitely odd, > and we should be looking at improving it. > > I wonder if this is now possible, given the DT is supposed to be stable ABI. I posted this [0] and Felipe + Benoit were pro change. I am still not sure if this is okay or just one glue layer per instance so I delay this until I am sure. Stable or not, what currently have in is beyond broken and it can't be fixed in kernel. I would add some code to check for the old nodes and give a proper warning and how to react. This should reduce the pain full search. [0] http://git.breakpoint.cc/cgit.cgi/bigeasy/linux.git/commit/?h=am335x_usb&id=0a60cd77ee50edd8cd07cbd699ed67b2c4b2ab93 Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
