Hi,
On Friday 14 June 2013 01:47 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 14/06/13 10:33, Tony Lindgren wrote:
If we want to fix something this late in the merge window, the patches
must have a clear description what caused the regression and what happens
without the patches. These patches don't have that. And they are marked
RFC also. So actually I'm not applying any of them before the regression
descriptions are there and the patches have been reposted without RFC
and have sufficient acks from people.
I posted this as RFC since this series uses _label_ and initially Felipe
din't want to find PHYs by _label_.
After the device names are created using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, our
original method of binding by device names doesn't work reliable (since
the device name changes). And I couldn't think of any other way to find
the PHY other than using _label_. So I just wanted to know if it's ok to
use _label_ or if there is any other better way to find PHYs.
No disagreement there.
Kishon, I tested the patches on top of v3.10-rc5, booting with nfs root
via usb gadget eth:
Overo: works
Beagle: works, but I need to reconnect the usb cable after kernel is up
Beagle-xm: doesn't work. The cable is detected correctly, though
Panda: works
The problems with Beagles are there even without these patches, so they
do make things better (fix Overo).
Thanks for testing this. I'll post a new version removing RFC after
Felipe ACKs it.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
